Cases 101 - 110 of 10,485
S.F.V. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv04233
Defendant:
Estate of Nicholas T. Ramos and United States of America
Plaintiff:
S.F.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
USA v. Ramos Juarez
as 24-20307
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Manuel Ramos Juarez
Cormier v. People of the State of California, et al.
as 24-4278
Defendant:
DOE, RAMOS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff:
IAN LAMONTE CORMIER
Valle-Ramos v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Jorge Valle-Ramos
Defendant:
Michael Stanley, Unknown Officers and City of Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Henacho et al
as 1:2024cv11728
Defendant:
Baldwin Henacho, Ramos, NSJ Medical Provider Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
James A Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Xavier Ramos
Defendant:
Vital Core, Delaware Department of Corrections and SCI / Sussex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Urbina v. Garland
as 24-60344
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Maryury Patricia Ramos-Urbina and Anthony Alessandro Molina-Ramos
Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4176
Petitioner:
DENIS A. RAMOS VENTURA and SILVIA ARACELY VENTURA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cortes v. Emmons Deli Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04767
Defendant:
Emmons Deli Inc., Abdullah Rahman Syed and Louis Ramos
Plaintiff:
Alberto and Abel Cortes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Duane Yates v. Beth Skinner, et al
as 24-2414
Defendant:
Sean Crawford, Deputy Warden Newton Correctional Faciltiy, William Sperfslage, Assistant Director IDOC, Dale Higgins, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Yates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
