Cases 101 - 110 of 293
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00531
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00587
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00527
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
County of San Diego v. Nielsen et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Ronald D. Vitiello, Kevin K. McAleenan, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00055
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rustem Kazazi, et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot, et al
as 19-3270
Respondent:
RONALD D. VITIELLO, Actin Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Commissioner, US Customs and Border Protection and others
Petitioner:
RUSTEM KAZAZI, LEJLA KAZAZI and ERALD KAZAZI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00569
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raul Lopez Reyes v. Erik Bonnar, et al
as 19-15604
Not Yet Classified:
JEFFREY LYNCH, Field Office Director, Denver Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement, RAUL LOPEZ REYES, ERIK BONNAR, Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
