Cases
Cases 101 - 109 of 109
Thomas Twillie v. Bradley Foulk, et al, et al
as 08-3316
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS LEE TWILLIE
Defendant - Appellee: ERIE POL DEPT, STEPHEN E. FRANKLIN, THOMAS NELSON and others
Fowler v. Thomas Nelson Publishing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv12572
Plaintiff: Bradley LaShawn Fowler
Defendant: Thomas Nelson Publishing
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Schultz et al v. Maclean et al
as 1:2008cv02061
Plaintiff: Hollie Schultz
Defendant: Heather Maclean and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muinos v. Thomas Nelson, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00271
Plaintiff: Hilda R. Muinos
Defendant: Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shorthill et al v. Conley et al Featured Case
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff: Carry Eugene Shorthill and Tina Rae
Defendant: James M. Conley, Christopher Roger Nelson, Richard Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Bynum
as 3:2007cv00946
Plaintiff: Thomas Nelson, Inc. and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Defendant: Michael Bynum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nelson v. Orlando Dive & Snorkel Tours, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00268
Plaintiff: Thomas Nelson
Defendant: Orlando Dive & Snorkel Tours, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nelson v. Orlando Dive & Snorkel Tours, Inc.
as 8:2007cv01135
Plaintiff: Thomas Nelson
Defendant: Orlando Dive & Snorkel Tours, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff: Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant: United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?