Cases 101 - 110 of 746
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeLaGarza v. Akwitti et al
as 6:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Cesar DeLaGarza
Defendant:
Warden FNU Akwitti, Lt. FNU Rancfer, Mental Health Mental Retardation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Balter v. Tinsley Advertising & Marketing, Inc.
as 1:2021cv24442
Plaintiff:
Michael Balter
Defendant:
Tinsley Advertising & Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Saramosing v. Corbett et al
as 5:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Tinsley Ariana Taylor M Saramosing
Defendant:
Kevin Corbett, Keith Reed, Kelly Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Pamela Tinsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ortiz et al v. ORD Trans, Inc et al
as 3:2021xc02668
Plaintiff:
Maria Ortiz and Vicente Ortiz
Defendant:
ORD Trans Inc and Torbin Tinsley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz et al v. ORD Trans Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02667
Plaintiff:
Maria Ortiz and Vicente Ortiz
Defendant:
ORD Trans Inc and Torbin Tinsley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65962
Plaintiff:
JEREMY TINSLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saramosing v. Oklahoma State Department of Health
as 5:2021cv00967
Plaintiff:
Dr. Tinsley Ariana Taylor M Saramosing
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
