Cases 101 - 110 of 134,121
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Spartanburg County et al
as 7:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Terria Holcomb
Defendant:
Spartanburg County, Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office, Officer Wesley E Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sucik v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sucik
Defendant:
Warden, Asst. Warden and Chief of Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Elijah Singleton
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Seymour et al
as 8:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Morton and Bryan Morton
Defendant:
Judge Margaret B Seymour, Justin W Holloway, Ronald L Gambrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Gozo v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01270
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Michael Jarrell Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
