Cases 101 - 110 of 46,319
Jerome v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Olajide Sunday Jerome
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
White, Nathan v. Moran, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Nathan Alexander White
Defendant:
Michael K. Moran and Amanda J. Ley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter, Ronald v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Ronald Marion Carpenter
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinikin, Jeremiah v. Tank
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah N. Kinikin
Defendant:
C.O. Tank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Sarnowski et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Sarnowski, Ms Archer and Ms Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. MedTorque Inc
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hess
Defendant:
MedTorque Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
