Cases 111 - 120 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Arbogast v. Phillips et al
as 2:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
John F. Arbogast
Defendant:
Jeremia J Phillips and Derrick Calip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rigsby v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2012cv02699
Plaintiff:
Julian Rigsby
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Rozario, Dr. Bahandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3868
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3867
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3866
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ESTATE OF EULA C. ARBOGAST et al v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2012cv01252
Plaintiff:
FLOYD L. ARBOGAST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arbogast v. Sheeley
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Franklin Arbogast
Defendant:
John Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv01547
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
B Jones, John/Jane Doe-8, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arbogast v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01350
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Arbogast
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
