Cases 111 - 120 of 144
May v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1
as 3:2011cv02204
Plaintiff:
Marcus May
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wendy Burrows v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 11-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDY L. BURROWS
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORP., SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO.1
Huerta v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 3:2011cv01673
Plaintiff:
Juan Huerta
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Menge v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Menge
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 , AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Parrish v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 6:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Norman Parrish
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Davidson v. BellSouth Short Term Disability Plan for Non-Salaried Employees
as 7:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Dale Davidson
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Espenscheid v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 2:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Stephen David Espenscheid
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVIS v. BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2010cv00977
Plaintiff:
AARON D. DAVIS
Defendant:
BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES , BELLSOUTH LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES , AT&T INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICE CENTER and others
Mediator:
NAHOMI HARKAVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
ARRANT v. AT&T INC et al
as 3:2010cv00481
Plaintiff:
TAMMY ARRANT
Defendant:
AT&T INC and AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.