Cases 111 - 120 of 2,267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Taylor et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Taylor and Robert Selway
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. et al v. Reolink Innovation Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. and ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Reolink Innovation Inc., Reolink Innovation Co., Ltd, Amazon.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BRAGG v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Bragg and RONALD J. BRAGG
Other:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM LLC and AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON HOME SERVICES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
AN LAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1427
Appellant:
ALMONDNET, INC.
Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989
King v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Verneater King
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Barry W. Rosen v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rosen
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC, Amazon Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bickerstaff v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Bickerstaff
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
