Cases 111 - 120 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emarsys North America, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07846
Plaintiff:
Emarsys North America, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01957
Defendant:
Old Navy Holdings, LLC, GPS Services, Inc., Old Navy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nemykina Anna
CAMPLIN/MARINO PROPERTIES INC v. GAP INC
as 2:2019cv00439
Plaintiff:
CAMPLIN/MARINO PROPERTIES INC
Defendant:
GAP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barba et al v. Old Navy, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv07032
Plaintiff:
Anastasha Barba and Brenda Tripicchio
Defendant:
Old Navy Holdings, LLC, GPS Services, Inc., Old Navy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vargas v. Gap, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00243
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Vargas
Defendant:
Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mackintosh v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2019at00870
Defendant:
Benchmark Capital Partners VII, LP, Louis Darnell Pritchett, Josef Arvin Acebedo and others
Plaintiff:
Adam John Mackintosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
