Cases 111 - 120 of 895
Doe 1 et al v. Musselman
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Jason Musselman
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winters, et al
as 23-35042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE WINTERS, Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dale et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
D Dale, C Schultz, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Luther et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Rainey
Defendant:
Deputy Luther, Mayyo, Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, et al
as 23-55006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE NO 19-3251
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIER INTAKE JONATHAN GAST, FHEO, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
DOE 1 et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Seabrook v. Doe #3 et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Onaje Kudura Seabrook
Defendant:
Jane Doe #3, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
