Cases 111 - 120 of 7,782
Valle et al v. Lamar Gourmet Deli Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv04547
Defendant:
Third Ave Deli Gourmet Corp. doing business as Diala Deli, Lamar Gourmet Deli Corp., Abrahim Kassim and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Valle and Pedro Camacho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cummings v. Warden, Brevard County Jail
as 6:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Harold Lamar Cummings, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Alfred Shavers, et al
as 24-11943
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALFRED LAMAR SHAVERS and TYRONE JAMES JONES
WOODS v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
WILLIE R CORFT and DANIELLE K JONES
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Lamar et al
as 3:2024cv00590
Defendant:
Dorothy Sedgwick, Lawson Lamar, Michael E. Martenko and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Demetrius Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anekwe
as 5:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Senior Chaplin Paul Anekwe
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TN State Conference of the NAACP, et al v. William Lee, et al
as 24-5546
Plaintiff:
LAMAR PERRY, LEOLA SCOTT, TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, on behalf of itself and its members and others
Defendant:
LISA HELTON, in her official capacity as Interim Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the State of Tennessee, TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee and others
Dixon #158463 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Defendant:
Unknown Becher, Unknown Fleicher, Michigan Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lamar Dixon #158463
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
