Cases 111 - 120 of 58,793
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Matthews et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02885
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matthews and Matthews Kathy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Colwell v. Schwarz et al
as 6:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Chad Colwell
Defendant:
LEO Matthew Schwarz, LEO John Doe 1 and LEO John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escalante v. Droege
as 5:2024cv03079
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Respondent:
Charles Droege
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
Travelers Casualty v. Jeld-Wen Holding, Inc.
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JELD-WEN HOLDING, INC., MARK A. BECK, L. BROOKS MALLARD and others
Jones v. Greene County Sherrif's Department
as 24-1402
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
GREENE COUNTY SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT and CORNELL UNIVERSITY CAMPUS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
