Cases 111 - 120 of 12,978
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent and Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray-Ginsberg (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Jon F. Gray-Ginsberg and Jon Frederick Gray-Ginsberg
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00868
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace, et al. v. County of Maricopa, et al.
as 24-1976
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SAMUEL WALLACE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Mayor of Phoenix and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
