Cases 111 - 120 of 147
Johnson v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00786
Petitioner:
Patrick Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Richardson et al
as 2:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Richardson, Watson and Savers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flemming v. Wright et al
as 9:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Lester Wright, Brian Fischer, Lucian J. LeClaire, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tafari v. Leclaire
as 11-2821
Defendant:
C.O. Smith, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, William Chase, Upstate Correctional Facility, Adams and others
Appellee:
Brad Reit, Upstate Correctional Facility, Donald Selsky, Jerry Hebert and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Mitchell v. Unknown Agent for Duval County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2011cv00430
Plaintiff:
Donald Mitchell
Defendant:
Unknown Agent for Duval County Sheriffs Office, Larry Lamonaco, Lt. Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Patrick Johnson
as 11-16038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK JOHNSON
Michael Thompson, et al v. Retirement Plan for Employee
as 10-3988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. THOMPSON, DAVID A. TROESTLER, JAMES PATRICK JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON DIVERSEY, INCORPORATED
Michael Thompson, et al v. Retirement Plan for SC Johnson
as 10-3989
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. THOMPSON, DAVID A. TROESTLER, JAMES PATRICK JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR SC JOHNSON AND SON, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
