Cases 111 - 120 of 135
Rayburn v. Wall et al
as 3:2010cv00084
Defendant:
FNU Wall, FNU Heh, FNU Wilkes and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Rayburn
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Akbar v. Lewis et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Petitioner:
Karim Abdul Akbar
Respondent:
Robert C. Lewis, FNU Neely, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Akbar v. Lewis et al
as 3:2010cv00023
Petitioner:
Karim Abdul Akbar
Respondent:
Robert C. Lewis, FNU Neely, Mr. Poplin and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Akbar v. Lewis et al
as 5:2009ct03196
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul Akbar
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Mr. Neely, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akbar v. Lewis et al
as 5:2009ct03194
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul Akbar
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Mr. Neely, Mr. Poplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akbar v. Lewis et al
as 5:2009cv00528
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul Akbar
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Mr. Neely, Mr. Poplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Scantlebury Personal Property
as 5:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Scantlebury Personal Property, One Sylvania Television Wall Mount, SN: 89838200129, One Bose Companion Three Home Theater System, SN: 1781733523 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
ALEXANDER et al v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR., LAWRENCE ALEXANDER, JR. and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, DAVID WRAY, RANDALL BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALL v. USA
as 1:2009cv00136
Petitioner:
DERICH JUNIOR WALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
