Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 123,856
Sherwood v. Rollins et al
as 7:2024cv03257
Plaintiff: Kim Marie Sherwood
Defendant: Mark Rollins, Mark S Smith and Spartanburg County School District One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Smith v. South Carolina DEA Narcotics Federal Agents
as 6:2024cv03247
Plaintiff: Justice Smith
Defendant: South Carolina DEA Narcotics Federal Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60918
Plaintiff: Raenell Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02017
Smith v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04451
Plaintiff: Stella Smith
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Healthcare Providers et al
as 1:2024cv02377
Plaintiff: Cortez D. Wilson, Salinas F. Smith and Salinas Acosta Weaver
Defendant: Healthcare Providers, Emory Healthcare Service Mgmt., LLC and Emory Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: Joleen Renee Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DUGGANS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS DUGGANS
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STEPHEN H SMITH and ELISA ZARATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Herzog, et al.
as 24-3394
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III
Defendant: Sgt FNU HERZOG, #17 SAC, FLURHER, #13 AC, #17 SAC, CRAIG, #13 AC, #17 SAC and others
Blake v. Pineda et al
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Victor Weldon Blake
Defendant: Louis Caleb Pineda, Why Be Normal Pizza, Inc. doing business as Domino's Pizza and Charlotte Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?