Cases 111 - 120 of 70,750
South Elkhorn Village, LLC v. City of Georgetown, KY, et al
as 24-5401
Plaintiff:
SOUTH ELKHORN VILLAGE, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, KY, GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM, CHASE AZEVEDO, in his official capacity as Manager of the Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer System and in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
James v. Royal Oak Schools
as 2:2024cv10477
Plaintiff:
Kamira James and SW
Defendant:
Royal Oak Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kramer v. Cedar Lee Special Improvement District
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kramer
Defendant:
Cedar Lee Special Improvement District and City of Cleveland Heights
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adam Fried v. Jose Garcia
as 24-3330
Plaintiff:
ADAM M. FRIED, Administrator of the Estate of Desmond Franklin
Defendant:
JOSE GARCIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael McIntosh, et al v. City of Madisonville, KY
as 24-5383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCINTOSH and REBECCA MCINTOSH
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISONVILLE, KY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Filing Error
as 5:2024cv00739
Defendant:
City of Canton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
