Cases 121 - 130 of 25,533
Mallouk, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-4834
Petitioner:
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ PEREZ, ARJUN DHAWAN, SUZANNE MALLOUK and others
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
PEREZ v. RINOWA CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61421
Defendant:
ADRIAN M PEREZ and RINOWA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHEL FRANK PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jay v. Wentworth et al
as 6:2024cv01276
Defendant:
John Wentworth, Christine Landers and Adrienne A. Chin-Perez
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Jay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAINLINE PRIVATE SECURITY, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03871
Defendant:
Tinsel, MAINLINE PRIVATE SECURITY, LLC, KENNETH FRYE and others
Plaintiff:
THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Martinez v. Perez
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Martinez and Brian Jason Martinez
Defendant:
Vernon Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant:
JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez-Plazas v. Garland
as 24-60397
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Cristian Gustavo Perez-Plazas
Perez v. Rose Hills Company
as 24-4798
Petitioner:
ROSE HILLS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Respondent:
ELIZABETH PEREZ, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Perez v. Capps, et al.
as 24-4813
Defendant:
HOLLIE RUSSELL, Correctional Lieutenant, JOHN AND JANE DOE, JOSEPH CAPPS, Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
ERNIE PEREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
