Cases 121 - 130 of 1,800
Wilson et al v. Geahlen Paving & Excavating LLC
as 2:2022cv02246
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Wilson and Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Plan, Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Education
Defendant:
Geahlen Paving & Excavating LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
I.B.E.W. Local 910 Welfare, Annuity and Pension Funds et al v. Fellows Electric Enterprises et al
as 5:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
I.B.E.W. Local 910 Welfare, Annuity and Pension Funds, Watertown Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Fellows Electric Enterprises and Martin R. Fellows
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL UNIONS 181, 320 AND TVA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND et al v. ALM ENTERPRISES, LLC
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL UNIONS 181, 320 AND TVA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, MICHAEL CRABTREE, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE CENTRAL PENSION FUND OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS and TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 181 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND
Defendant:
ALM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. East Port Excav Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02639
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers Local Union No. 1, Jack Argila and others
Defendant:
East Port Excav Inc and Steven Governale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. Dardon's Roofing, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv02372
Plaintiff:
Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Dardon's Roofing, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. CITY WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.
as 1:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
CITY WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MO-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Prudent Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MO-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund, MO-Kan Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund, Teamsters Local Union No 541 Vacation-Holiday Fund and others
Defendant:
Prudent Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. San Marino Cement Wall, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10861
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
San Marino Cement Wall, Inc. and George Rastelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the I.U.P.A.T. District Council #11 Health Fund et al v. Cherry Hill Glass Co Inc
as 3:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the I.U.P.A.T. District Council #11 Health Fund, Trustees of the I.U.P.A.T. District Council #11 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and District Council #11 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Cherry Hill Glass Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. Maxwell Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Maxwell Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
