Cases 121 - 130 of 206
Tatom v. Corizon Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Tatom, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Gordon, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Campbell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Reena Campbell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scott v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Danny Burl, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Floyd et al
as 1:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montel Deon Murry
Defendant:
Mary Beth Floyd, Ruth Marie Skrapates, Geraldine G Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Arkansas
as 3:2012cv03125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Campbell
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Axelson v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tim Axelson
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc, Kevin Bice, J M Courtney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Isaac M McDonald
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Roland Anderson, Dorothy Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jaris Lea Campbell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
