Cases 121 - 130 of 268
Chien v. Barron et al
as 3:2017mc00147
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Barron and Skypeople Fruit Juice Corp.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Iyka Enterprises, Inc. v. RM2-LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04521
Plaintiff:
Iyka Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
RM2-LLC, Richard Maloney, Jeffrey Chien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chien v. Commonwealth of VA et al
as 1:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Commonwealth of VA , Mark R. Herring , Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Chien -vs- William K. Grogan, et al
as 1:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
William K. Grogan and William K Grogan & Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNIVEST CAPITAL, INC. v. CHIEN TRANSITIONS MHT LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
UNIVEST CAPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
CHIEN TRANSITIONS MHT LLC, LAWRENCE CHIEN and ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chien Hsu v. The Boeing Company et al
as 8:2017cv00195
Defendant:
Does and The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Chien Hsu
Chien v. Grogan et al
as 1:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
Chien and Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Grogan, William K Grogan and William K Grogan & Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chien v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Andrew K Clark , William K Grogan , LeClairRyan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Havlish v. Clearstream Banking, S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv08075
Plaintiff:
Fiona Havlish , Helen Rosenthal , Estate of Jeffrey Coale and others
Defendant:
Clearstream Banking, S.A., Banca UBAE SpA, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
