Cases 121 - 130 of 442
Johnny Ruffin v. David Mitchell
as 21-2424
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY M. RUFFIN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL
Contrell Plummer v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 21-2402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONTRELL PLUMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, Agency Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, DAVID MITCHELL, Warden Pinckneyville CC, NURSE NANCY, Pinckneyville CC and others
Andrew Ruiz v. Alberto Butalid, et al
as 21-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBERTO BUTALID, R. SCOTT THOMPSON, JOHN R. BALDWIN and others
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32767
Plaintiff:
DAVID MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrieta v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv03843
Petitioner:
Joseph Arrieta
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fletcher v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00716
Defendant:
Sergent Johnson, Travis Bayler, Sergent Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv02332
Petitioner:
Giovann Jones
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Connell Wilson, Mario King, Shakari Ore and others
Defendant:
Julien Rattelade, Jason Gwinn, David Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
