Cases 121 - 130 of 158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al v. Kelly et al
as 3:2010cv00823
Defendant:
Jeanie Thomas Adams, Bethany World Prayer Center, Clarence R Halpin and others
Plaintiff:
Allstate Life Insurance Company, American Heritage Life Insurance Company and Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
HALPIN v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84852
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH H. HALPIN
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halpin et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv07046
Plaintiff:
John Halpin and Marilyn Halpin
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Bramble et al v. Campbell County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
William J. Bramble, Jr. , Clark Byers , Martha Camacho and others
Defendant:
Campbell County, Kentucky, Campbell County Fiscal Court, Greg Buckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALPIN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. HALPIN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALPIN v. BARNEGAT BAY DREDGING CO., INCORPORATED
as 3:2010cv03245
Plaintiff:
VERNON HALPIN
Defendant:
BARNEGAT BAY DREDGING CO., INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust, et al v. Development Resources, et al
as 10-12174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIANNE ROGGENBUCK TRUST, REBECCA G. AUREUS, TAMMY BOEHM and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVE BOEHM
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES GROUP, LLC, LEGACY DUNES CONDOMINIUM, LLC, A Florida Limited Liability Company, MICHAEL K. HALPIN and others
Halpin et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv01484
Plaintiff:
Neil Halpin and Deborah Halpin
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
