Cases 121 - 130 of 149
Mielcarek v. loanDepot.com, LLC
as 1:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
Iesen Mielcarek
Defendant:
Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.17 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-72-10.14 et al
as 3:2018cv01909
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.17 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-72-10.14, LEWIS PEPPERMAN, MARGHERITA PEPPERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hook v. Ascendum Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hook
Defendant:
Ascendum Solutions, LLC and LoanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Horne v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
as 3:2017cv01479
Defendant:
LoanDepot.com, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brant Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Putnam v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
as 8:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
David Putnam
Defendant:
LoanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Skonie et al (PLR2)
as 2:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Martha Smith
Defendant:
Edward C Skonie, Wanda Skonie, LoanDepot.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Addington et al v. Loandepot.com, LLC
as 2:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Arlie C. Addington and Rena Sue Addington
Defendant:
Loandepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
