Cases 121 - 130 of 952
Elizabeth Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-1187
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH K. KERWIN, Regional Director of Region 7 of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cardtek International, Inc. v. the Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Cardtek International, Inc.
Defendant:
the Kroger Co. and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
LaPointe v. Starbucks Corporation
as 7:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Emily LaPointe
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: National Labor Relations Board
as 23-120
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
WOODARD v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
TARAHYA WOODARD
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A STARBUCKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
ROMERO et al v. INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROMERO and ERIC WRIGHT
Defendant:
INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, SDi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Debose v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Debose
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: Workers United
as 22-3229
Petitioner:
Workers United
Respondent:
Linda M. Leslie and Starbucks Corporation
Schleyer et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv10932
Plaintiff:
Eric Schleyer and Emilyn Mishkan
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
