Cases 121 - 130 of 277
Frazier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01388
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Frazier , Renee Anderson , Darlene Arden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jake v. Hof et al
as 3:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Treshaun Jake
Defendant:
Michael Hof, Unknown Party, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luczak v. Psfister et al
as 1:2016cv02663
Plaintiff:
Theodore Luczak
Defendant:
Randy Psfister, Mary Cerda, Z. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dampier v. Dorethy et al
as 4:2016cv04042
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Dampier
Defendant:
Stephanie Dorethy and Sarah Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodgkinson v. Derhake et al
as 3:2015cv03358
Plaintiff:
Russell R. Hodgkinson
Defendant:
Christopher Derhake, Matthew Beswick, Wenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton et al v. Earle Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dale Hampton , Waldo Mcwane and Jerry Eaves
Defendant:
Earle Arkansas, City of , Carolyn Jones , Tyrone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hampton et al v. Earle Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00198
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dale Hampton , Waldo Mcwane and Jerry Eaves
Defendant:
Earle Arkansas, City of , Carolyn Jones , Tyrone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Terry Blake
Defendant:
Sarah Johnson and April Rankin-Wampler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hardy et al
as 1:2015cv07944
Plaintiff:
Teaone Shashawn Bell
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Jeffrey Stoudt, Crystal Latigo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Obaisi et al
as 1:2015cv07187
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
S. Obaisi, A. Martija, Sarah Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
