Cases 121 - 130 of 266,308
Morgan v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04628
Plaintiff:
Donna Morgan
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Borzeka v. L'Oreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04611
Plaintiff:
Anna Borzeka
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
Shermarie R. Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gray v. USA
as 4:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Charles Gray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
De Darr v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Maria Castro De Darr
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PADILLA et al v. HETERO DRUGS LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv06664
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PADILLA and CINDY PADILLA
Defendant:
HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS LTD, AVKARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FMC CORPORATION v. SHARDA USA LLC
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
FMC CORPORATION
Defendant:
SHARDA USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DFUSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
DFUSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
VESUVIUS USA CORPORATION v. MCCRACKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
VESUVIUS USA CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOSEPH A MCCRACKEN and TYK AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Munsch et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc. d/b/a The Home Depot
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Pamela Munsch and William Munsch
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. d/b/a The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
