Cases 121 - 130 of 23,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC. v. CLARK, JR.
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
CONCRETE ACCESSORIES OF GA, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES CLARK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 cc Contract Claims
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELISABETH FISHER WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ALLEN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
MICHAEL THOMAS ALLEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
ARMSTRONG v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and NCL CORPORATION LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KOSTUCK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
JACE KOSTUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TOSHIBA GLOBAL COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. TAWA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
TOSHIBA GLOBAL COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
TAWA, INC., TAWA SERVICES, INC. and TAWA SUPERMARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LETTERLOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00284
Petitioner:
DERRICK DERRAIL LETTERLOUGH
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
