Cases 121 - 130 of 6,261
FORD v. SELENE FINANCE LP et al
as 1:2023cv03653
Not Classified By Court:
YAIDA O. FORD and SELENE FINANCE LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morton v. Collins et al
as 6:2023cv04913
Plaintiff:
Lokein Morton
Defendant:
John Collins, Laurie LaChapelle, Kim Hussey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Brooks (Finley-Calip) v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2023cv05252
Plaintiff:
LaTonya R. Brooks (Finley-Calip)
Defendant:
County of Alameda, T. Rosalind, D. Pascoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baur et al v. Peoples Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baur and Baur Food Group, LLC
Defendant:
Peoples Bancshares, Inc. doing business as Peoples Bank and The Hartford Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adedeji v. Bank of America, et al
as 23-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEHINDE OLATUNJI ADEDEJI
Plaintiff:
WOODRON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, HARR TOYOTA, Car Dealer, KNIGHT-DIK INSURANCE, Insurance Agency and others
Rubenstein et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 5:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Chris Rubenstein
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Linman et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 5:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Scott Linman
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Strother v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strother
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Pablo Espin v. Citibank, N.A.
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PABLO ESPIN, NICHOLAS PADAO, KEITH TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
