Cases 131 - 140 of 236
Johannes v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv11691
Plaintiff:
Robert Johannes
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns and Dalton Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
William Hill v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-1492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, BONITA J. HOFFNER, Warden, LINDA BECKWITH, Deputy Warden and others
Smith et al v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv11601
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith, Nancy Patricia Vanloon, Holly Marie Jones and others
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Carmen Palmer, Anthony Stewart and others
Boyer et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11503
Plaintiff:
Kathy Ann Boyer and James William Boyer
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H Heyns, Millicent Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Lentz v. Bettina Wells, et al
as 14-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTINA J. WELLS, SHANE JACKSON, DARRELL STEWARD and others
Arojojoye v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11136
Plaintiff:
Victor Arojojoye
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Joan Roggenbuck, Lori Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rivera #239567
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightningbolt v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv10937
Plaintiff:
Robert Lightningbolt
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Lakin v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv10421
Plaintiff:
David Lakin
Defendant:
Daniel H Heyns, Joseph Barrett and Matthew Young
Michael Brown v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 14-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA A. CARUSO, RICHARD MCKEON, DENNIS M. STRAUB, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
