Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 270
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16375
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL and others
Defendant - Appellee: PENNY PRITZKER, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, EILEEN SOBECK, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries and others
Humane Society of the United States v. Pet e-Tailing Group, LLC
as 3:2014cv01032
Petitioner: Humane Society of the United States
Respondent: Pet e-Tailing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
as 1:2014cv00840
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Initiative and Referendum Inst, et al v. USPS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant: Initiative and Referendum Institute, Citizens for Limited Taxation, Humane Society of the United States and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Nebraskans for Limited Terms, Oregonians for Fair Elections, Barbara C. Anderson and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States Postal Service
Chinatown Neighborhood Associa, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-15781
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit corporation and ASIAN AMERICANS FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT, a political action committee
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California and CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director, California Department of Fish and Game
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION and ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN OCEAN HARMONY ALLIANCE
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL et al v. JEWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00670
Plaintiff: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Defendant: SALLY JEWELL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL M. ASHE and others
Intervenor Defendant: FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, ZIMBABWE CONSERVATION TASK FORCE, HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-55580
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant: FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant - Appellee: RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
The Humane Society of the United States et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2014cv11754
Plaintiff: The Humane Society of the United States , Center for Biological Diversity , Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, John K. Bullard, Eileen Sobeck and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Puppies 'N Love et al v. Phoenix, City of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00073
Defendant: Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff: Puppies 'N Love , Frank Mineo and Vicki Mineo
Intervenor_defendant: The Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?