Cases 131 - 140 of 18,373
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nash v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Phillip Nash
Defendant:
Lauren Pacheco, Debney Jaramillo, Gabriel Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MARRERO v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04336
Plaintiff:
SHELIA E. MARRERO
Defendant:
WALMART INC., KRG BAYONNE URBAN RENEWAL, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 (fictitiously named) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parrella v. Talton et al
as 2:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Daniel Parrella
Defendant:
Z Transportation Inc., Omar Talton and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gray v. Kohl's, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Melissa A. Gray
Defendant:
Kohl's, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gibson Brands v. Armadillo DE
as 24-40198
Plaintiff:
Gibson Brands, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Incorporated, a Florida corporation, John Doe 1 - 10 and Concordia Investment Partners, L.L.C.
Mazen Agha v. SoFi Lending Corp., et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
MAZEN HASAN AGHA
Defendant:
SOFI LENDING CORP., SOFI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
BRANHAM v. OWENS, JR. et al
as 3:2024cv04254
Plaintiff:
MARLIN BRANHAM
Defendant:
JACK O. OWENS, JR., STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
