Cases 131 - 140 of 290
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lethas Pies, LLC et al v. Principis Capital, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv05148
Plaintiff:
Lethas Pies, LLC, Timothy Glenn and Rhonda Glenn
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, John Does 11-20 and Principis Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. John Does #1-4 et al
as 5:2019cv05137
Plaintiff:
Edward King
Defendant:
John Does #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. John Autrey Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv05136
Defendant:
Tate Zimmerman, Taz, LLC, John Autrey Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dean Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hacala v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv05131
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Hacala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marter v. Potlatchdeltic Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Potlatchdeltic Corporation and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Bruce Marter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. John Doe #1 et al
as 5:2019cv05110
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe Cook Supervisor, Sheriff Tim Helder, John or Jane Doe Charge Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02058
Plaintiff:
Lorie Casey
Defendant:
Phillips Knight, Jr., New Prime, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv05086
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Dollar General Corporation and Dollar General Corporation doing business as Dollar General No. 13293
Plaintiff:
Jim L. Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
