Cases 131 - 140 of 150
Joshua Hoskins v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA HOSKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, OFFICER YOUNG and others
Joshua Hoskins v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA HOSKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, JEFFREY FERRELL and others
Hutchins v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Dion Hutchins
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Ms. Rudy, Ms. Blunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Tennis et al
as 3:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Robinson
Defendant:
Franklin Tennis, Brian Thompson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairman v. BARR et al
as 3:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Wendell W. Fairman, Sr.
Defendant:
OFFICER BARR, Officer Govier, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Grant et al
as 1:2009cv23414
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Corporal Grant, Officer Taylor and Officer Newport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy Williams v. Sergeant Gonzalez
as 09-7764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT GONZALEZ, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TAYLOR and others
Gil v. Brewers et al
as 4:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gil
Defendant:
Warden Brewers, A.W. Teressano, Mr. Mangus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Umberger v. Taylor et al
as 5:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
Chris Umberger
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Taylor and Correctional Officer Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius Hill v. Terry O'Brien
as 09-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, MR. STRICKLAND, Associate Warden, MR. WILSON, Captain and others
Defendant - None:
COUNSELOR PULIVAR, COUNSELOR MULLINS, MS. HALL, Case Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
