Cases 131 - 140 of 178
McMillian et al v. Harrison et al
as 5:2013ct03259
Plaintiff:
Eric M. McMillian and Darryl LaFace
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Canteen Food Services and Shaw Food Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Norman Patrick Caldwell
Defendant:
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. , The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Shaw Industries Long Term Disability Coverage Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Shaw v. Rex Hospital, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00280
Defendant:
Rex Hospital, Inc. and Rex Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Shaw v. Harris et al
as 5:2012cv00804
Plaintiff:
Kamelia Shaw
Defendant:
Nelson G. Harris, Harris & Hilton, P.A., Stephen P. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SHAW v. USA
as 1:2012cv01340
Petitioner:
JAMES CECIL SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pursley v. The Shaw Group Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00714
Defendant:
The Shaw Group Inc., Stone & Webster Construction, Inc. and Stone & Webster Services, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Meek Guy Pursley, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
WILLINGHAM v. SUMMERS, et al
as 1:2012cv01104
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM
Defendant:
LYNN C. SUMMERS, K. SANDBACK, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Shaw
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Shaw v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Diane Shaw
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
