General Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 417,210
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner: Ronald B. Gray
Respondent: Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henke v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner: Greg Allen Henke
Respondent: Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ahkeem Scott-Manna v. Mark Sevier
as 24-1667
Petitioner: AKHEEM S. SCOTT-MANNA
Respondent: MARK R. SEVIER, Warden
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03293
Petitioner: Rigoberto Luna Luna
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sparkman v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff: Nakeith C Sparkman
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff: Lamont Johnson
Defendant: Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfe v. Rivello et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00040
Petitioner: JAMES A. WOLFE
Respondent: John Rivello and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan Leppert v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11184
Petitioner: MORGAN AMANDA LEPPERT
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner: Nathan E. Ray
Respondent: F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner: Thomas Johnson
Respondent: James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?