General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 131 - 140 of 36,590
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner: Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent: Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLean v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2024cv01323
Petitioner: Raekwon McLean
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Greenville County Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00943
Petitioner: Kelvin Toyo Henry
Respondent: Sheriff Greenville County Court, Sheriff Greenville Police Department, Cheif Consel Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aguon v. Hazelton F.C.I. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner: Robert L. Aguon
Respondent: Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S. and The O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner: Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner: Richard Thurston
Respondent: Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeats v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00263
Petitioner: Killian Yeats
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner: Timothy James Thomas
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Redmon v. Unknown
as 24-6219
Petitioner: JOHN H. REDMON
Respondent: UNKNOWN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?