Cases 141 - 150 of 323
Avery Lail, Jr. v. Erik Hooks
as 19-7656
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner / Appellant:
AVERY J. LAIL, JR.
Terrance James-Bey v. NC Dept of Public Safety
as 19-7642
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS HAMILTON, Unit Manager, E-Unit, in his individual and official capacities, H. CORPENING, Superintendent, in his individual and official capacities, J. NEAL, C.O., in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY, In Propria Persona Sui Juris
Howe v. Correction Enterprises et al
as 2:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Robert Leon, Annie Harvey, W David Guice and others
Plaintiff:
George Howe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Antoine Martin v. Roy Cooper
as 19-2196
Defendant / Appellee:
HERTFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, LT. MARTY DAVIS, Major, VERNON STEWART, District Attorney (District 11A) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE D. MARTIN
BULLOCK v. HOOKS
as 1:2019cv01092
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mobley v. Erik A. Hooks
as 3:2019cv00571
Petitioner:
Anita Mobley
Respondent:
Clerk of Superior Court, Mecklenburg County and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lyles v. Hooks
as 5:2019hc02285
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks
Petitioner:
Hildred Manuel Lyles, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDYKE v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, KENNETH E. LASSITER and KATY POOLE
Plaintiff:
LARRY J. VANDYKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Hooks
as 1:2019cv00292
Petitioner:
James E. Arrington
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Correction and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blakeman v. Solana et al
as 5:2019ct03280
Defendant:
Joe Solana, Erik A. Hooks and Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
