Cases 141 - 150 of 1,106
MICKLES v. STEELE et al
as 2:2022cv00476
Defendant:
PATRICE POWELL, TAMONTE STEELE, LATOYA COPELAND and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DRURY v. BURKHART et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. DRURY
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, BRIDGER D. FOY, JOHN LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mann v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Lucas Robert-Jay Mann
Defendant:
Miller, Davis and Rojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES et al v. LELAND et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
ERIKA, as Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF DAVIES, TONY, deceased DAVIES and ERIKA DAVIES
Defendant:
MARK LELAND and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cotton v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Veltor Cotton
Defendant:
Davis, Lewis, Crittendon and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grobler v. Leasure et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SERGIO GROBLER
Defendant:
ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
GRAU v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
DAVE GRAU and DALE A. GRAU
Defendant:
STEVE KALLIS and LINDA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. GEO GROUP, INC et al
as 1:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MOORE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC, MARK SEVIER, G. CECIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
