Cases 151 - 160 of 414
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. MARSH et al
as 3:2020cv00158
Respondent:
GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, CHARLES EHRLICH, LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIERCE v. MARSH et al
as 2:2020cv03843
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, D.A OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and DR. ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
BRANDON TREMAYNE PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blankenship v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Hikma Labs Inc., Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Salina Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerber v. Noah Associates, Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv04471
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber and Robert Gerber
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 and Noah Associates, Incorporated doing business as Noah Clinical Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
MILLARD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2020cv00215
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DR. ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
MARTY JOSEPH MILLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerber v. Eastern PPE Imports, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04408
Defendant:
Eastern PPE Imports, LLC and John Does, 1-10
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber and Robert Gerber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Serieux v.Dr. Smith and Dr. Wheatley
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Dr. Nathaniel Weekly, Dr. D. Weekly, Nathaniel Wheatley and others
Plaintiff:
Francis B. Serieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Serieux vs Dr.Robert B. Smith
as 3:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Dr. Robert B. Smith
Plaintiff:
Francis B. Serieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Serieux v. Smith
as 3:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Dr. Robert B. Smith
Plaintiff:
Francis B. Serieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
