Cases 161 - 170 of 194
Ford v. Carter et al
as 4:2009cv01948
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Ford, III
Defendant:
R Carter, R Simmons, Michael Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LABAR v. ALERCIA et al
as 5:2009cv04182
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LABAR and DANIEL LABAR
Defendant:
JAMES T. ALERCIA, KEITH BORDER, THOMAS VOGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Alexander et al v. Gulstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04103
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander, Jonathan Alexander, Arthur Boyd and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jemison v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv01035
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Michael Mitchell and Takeka Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gormon v. David Dowd, et al
as 09-2183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John D. Gormon
Defendant - Appellee:
David L. Dowd, Circuit Court Judge, Probate Division, Officially and Individually, Charles S. Birmingham, Assistant Attorney General, Officially and Individually, Theodore A. Bruce, Assistant Attorney General, Officially and Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jemison v. Wade et al
as 4:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Kizzire Wade, John Mason and Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Michael Mitchell
as 09-3454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
USA v. Timothy Mitchell
as 09-30169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL MITCHELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
