Death Penalty Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 4,558
Beatty v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-70010
Petitioner / Appellant: Tracy Lane Beatty
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jonathan Stephenson v. Tony Mays
as 22-6021
Petitioner / Appellant: JONATHAN W. STEPHENSON
Respondent / Appellee: TONY MAYS, Warden
Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff
as 22-3175
Petitioner: Michael A. Tisius
Respondent: David Vandergriff, Warden
Barbee v. Collier
as 22-70012
Plaintiff / Appellee: Stephen Dale Barbee
Defendant / Appellant: Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Dennis Crowley
Murray Hooper v. David Shinn, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-99012
Petitioner / Appellant: MURRAY HOOPER
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry, STACI IBARRA, Warden, Eyman Prison and RODNEY CARR, Warden, Florence Prison
Hooper v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01935
Petitioner: Murray Hooper
Respondent: David Shinn, Staci Ibarra and Rodney Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Ulysses Charles Sneed v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-13328
Petitioner / Appellant: ULYSSES CHARLES SNEED
Respondent / Appellee: HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Cole v. Farris
as 22-5093
Petitioner / Appellant: BENJAMIN COLE
Respondent / Appellee: JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
James Fayed v. Warden San Quentin State Prison
as 22-99010
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Jeffery William Paul v. John F. Caraway, et al
as 22-2749
Petitioner: JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Respondent: JOHN F. CARAWAY, Warden and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?