Cases 171 - 180 of 10,602
McGuirk v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00816
Petitioner:
Terrence Joseph McGuirk
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Louie Thompson Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Payne v. McGuire et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Payne
Defendant:
William W. McGuire, John Doe, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quillen-Hawk v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Naomi Louise Quillen-Hawk
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniels et al v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Daniels and Robert Lee Daniels, Sr.
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Prosecu Jonathan Jewell, Mingo County Assista Joshua Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Purpera v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00818
Petitioner:
Frank Craig Purpera, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jenkins v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Keyshaun Jenkins
Defendant:
FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Ashanti Rhan Henry
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
