Cases 11 - 20 of 2,453
Armstrong v. Warren County et al
as 4:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Demetrous Armstrong
Defendant:
Lt. Adam Bennett, Sgt. Britany Hertzog, Warren County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv01911
Petitioner:
Paul R. Conley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis (PS) v. Pippin et al
as 1:2024cv02197
Defendant:
Issac Conley, Malek Brewer, Juan Lemones Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONLEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03814
Plaintiff:
MELISSA CONLEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eric ConleyIn re: Eric Conley
as 24-3641
Respondent:
ANGELA HUNSINGER-STUFF, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC W. CONLEY
Janalyn C. Conley v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv06235
Plaintiff:
Janalyn C. Conley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jackson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv50314
Defendant:
Aroyal, Raviden, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jelnek et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran,
as 1:2024cv05520
Plaintiff:
Ashten Moss, Sunny Chiang, Devonte Carter and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Conley v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02929
Plaintiff:
Michael Conley
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
