Cases 11 - 20 of 5,879
HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION and MIKE HOWELL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Palmer v. City of Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Keriekan Palmer
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach, Travis Barrett, Collin Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREDERICK v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
QUINTON FREDERICK
Defendant:
L MURPHY, G ENGLISH and R HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron-Roche v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Negron-Roche
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Kifer, Henri Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01921
Plaintiff:
Wesley Howell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Anton et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03964
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Anton, Carl Armato, David Banks, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Howell, II v. Lifetime Dock & Lumber, Inc.
as 4:2024cv10050
Plaintiff:
Denny L Howell, II
Defendant:
Lifetime Dock & Lumber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
B&G Charter Management Limited v. S/V Zazie, et al
as 24-1888
Plaintiff:
B&G CHARTER MANAGEMENT LTD
Defendant:
S/V ZAZIE, U.S.C.G. No. 1324379, GRADY HOWELL TUMLIN, JR. and DEBRA JEAN ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
