Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Fail v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2026cv01037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vaughn Fail
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Drivers License Division, Salt Lake City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brugger v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2026cv05001
Plaintiff:
Tori Micah Brugger
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff's Office, Connor Klokocnik and Darren Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vaughn v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vaughn
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation as Successor in Interest to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Vaughn v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01583
Plaintiff:
Shana Vaughn
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vaughn v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01584
Plaintiff:
Shane Vaughn
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jabo-Bevins v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2026cv00771
Defendant:
Katrina Van Loock, Charles P. Vaughn, Rhonda Raulerson Portwood and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jabo-Bevins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Vaughn v. Daniel Akers, et al
as 26-5903
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAUL VAUGHN
Defendant:
DANIEL AKERS, SERGEANT CHRISTINA GRIFFITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAM CAMPBELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
