Cases 11 - 20 of 6,325
United States of America v. Best (Thomas)
as 24-1453
Defendant:
JEFFREY THOMAS, WALLACE BEST, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mendez v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mario A Mendez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department, Geo Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. American Trucking & Transportation Insurance Co Risk Retention Group et al
as 5:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE CHATMAN
Defendant:
American Trucking & Transportation Insurance Co Risk Retention Group, MVT SERVICES, LLC d/b/a MESILLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION and BLANCA O. MENDEZ-DURAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Best
as 24-1411
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
