Cases 1 - 10 of 6,528
Velazquez Mendez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Hilda Luz Velazquez Mendez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Mendez Feliz
as 24-3301
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 1 and MARCOS ANTONIO MENDEZ FELIZ
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Rivera (Amador Rivera)
as 24-3305
Defendant:
JOSE TORRES, WILLIAM ALBERT, RAMON COLLAZO and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mendez v. Colvin
as 4:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mendez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mendez v. Angel's Grill & Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv09755
Defendant:
Restitullo, Angel Garcia, Margarita Restituyo and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez et al v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority et al
as 3:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Hector Cardona, Edwin Lozada, Juan Santiago and others
Defendant:
Doriel Pagn Crespo and Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Symonette v. Governor Of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv01313
Defendant:
Judge Bertila Soto, Judge Lawson, Daniel Palardy and others
Plaintiff:
Vedrick LaMonte Symonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Nolasco de Esteban, et al v. Garland
as 24-2141
Petitioner:
BLANCA ELIZABETH MENDEZ-NOLASCO DE ESTEBAN and A.Y.E.M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
