Cases 11 - 20 of 165
Netherland v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Burns Netherland
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Melissa W. Nelson, T.P. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demary et al v. Freedom Trucks of America L L C et al
as 2:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Daniel Demary and Tammy Demary
Defendant:
Freedom Trucks of America, LLC, JW Nelson Transports Inc, Trimac Transportation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leroy L. Brown
Defendant:
D.E. Smith, H.C. Taylor, C.C. Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHURCH et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHURCH, LESLEY CHURCH, ALMA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guzy et al v. Nelson et al
as 3:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Timothy W. Nelson, Evans Nelson & Company, CPAs and Timothy W. Nelson, CPA
Plaintiff:
Shannon Guzy and Mark R. Guzy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Nelson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00236
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Charles W. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00058
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Charles W. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Nelson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
